🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an celebration that started out as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass functions where Black people are compensated to talk to white audiences about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in winter, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since those days, focusing less on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and more on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the observance is celebrated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a valuable example in how co-option leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how important it is to rethink Black History Month more than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the summer we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels emboldened to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are surging in the EU as a entirety.

In the United States, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the state. A effort to remove the history of people of color and narrative from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance symbolises how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. Denise Miller, a professor at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month altogether, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade politics, and provides room for citizens, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves simple recognition of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to subtle slights, but confronted with the threats that face all if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and adaptive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is required – Contemporary Black History Month.